My Photo

Peeps

« Interconnectedness of All Things | Main | On Joy and Sorrow »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834559b4c69e200e5507274748834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Google Labs Aptitude Test (GLAT):

» Even Non Geeks Might Enjoy... from John Battelle's Searchblog
...reading Adam Rifkin's post about the Google Labs Aptitude Test, which is included at the bottom of his post. Sample question: 6. On your first day at Google, you discover that your cubicle mate wrote the textbook you used as a primary resource in yo... [Read More]

» Google Labs Aptitude Test (GLAT) from A Sabre Geek
I received my copy of the GLAT with the current issue of MIT’s Technology Review magazine (sub required). “Simply answer all questions to the best of your abilities (cheaters answer to the karma police)..... Adam Rifkin has duplicated the questions [Read More]

» Questions from the Google Labs Aptitude Test from Search Engine Watch Blog
Both G.L. and J.B. point us to this this blog post by Adam Rifkin that includes questions from the Google Labs Aptitude Test.... [Read More]

» GLAT from Shima's
Googleのユニークな適性テスト、実は求人広告?という記事があったので、さっそくGLATをやってみることに。画像をテキストにしたものがこちら。   響きはGMATのパロディっぽいけど、記述以外でぱっと見わかる問題がない…。そしてなんだかジョークっぽいのもはいってる。... [Read More]

» GLAT Question 1 from Elliott C. Back, Cornell Student
[Read More]

» "Fluffy Bunny" is a WinSock-puppet from The Now Economy
We love Google's new Desktop Search. We've been arguing about something like this for a year or more. The idea of searching everything you've seen — not just your hard drive, but everything hyperlinked to it (such as your surfing... [Read More]

» Questions from the Google Labs Aptitude Test from Search Engine Watch Blog
Both G.L. and J.B. point us to this blog post by Adam Rifkin that includes questions from the Google Labs Aptitude Test. UPDATE: Google Has Posted the Test on the Google Blog.... [Read More]

» Hiring 101 from Relax, Everything Is Deeply Intertwingled
As I updated my Entrepreneurship 101 post, I re-read Hiring: No False Positives by Joe Kraus, and Hiring: False Positives and Negatives by Tim Converse, and I was struck by how challenging hiring is, even if you know what you [Read More]

» The GLAT from a free Orange | Links
A sample Google Labs Aptitude Test.... [Read More]

Comments

Timboy

Howard, I don't work at Google either ... how about Yahoo! Search though? Post the answer to GLAT #19, and then let's talk... (This goes for anyone, actually :)

Howard Robbins

GLAT Problem: Given a triangle ABC, how would you use only a compass and straight edge to find a point P such that triangles ABP, ACP, and BCP have equal perimeters? (Assume that ABC is constructed so that a solution does exist.)

Amended answer: I should have explained more clearly. Simple algebra gives AP - BC = BP - AC = CP - AB. Call this quantity Q. Then AP = BC+Q, BP = AC+Q, and CP = AB+Q. But these three equations have a simple geometric interpretation:

A circle of radius |Q|, centered at P, is tangent to circles of radii BC, AC, and AB, centered at the vertices A, B, and C. This is the classic 3-circles problem, with the additional requirement that the tangencies must be all external (Q>0) or all internal (Q<0).

The Duke

Question #19 really is the key, isn't it?

I believe I have the (or at least one) answer, but there's no way Google would hire me.

Anyway, it took me a month, but I solved every one except #10. I did use an Excel spreadsheet to calculate #17, is that "cheating"?

Not bad for a high-school education!

Regards,
The Duke

i never use Google - I use altavista

How about I give you (10) engineering questions and if you get at least (6) right MAYBE I might work for you (out of my home)

Timboy

Heh. Post the questions, that's always fun. But working from home is a lose IMHO.

btw, If you're using Altavista, then you're using Yahoo Search. Thank you for your support.

Hew

I think I have a nice solution to problem #19: take a look at

http://www.hewwolff.org/GoogleProof/proof.html

Google does not seem to be interested in this. :-( But maybe someone else will be....

Adam

Ok, I'm impressed, Hew. Nicely done. They should definitely hire you -- and if not them, maybe you're right that someone else will be interested.

Also, thanks for the link to some of the Mathematica solutions. Now that the cat's out of the bag, I guess we can look forward to

GLAT II: Judgment Day
*wink*

John Woods

Question 16 - Triangle ABC

B\
| C
A/

For ABP, ACP, BCP to have equal perimeters the point P must be in the centre of the equilateral triangle. This point is located by aligning the triangle so that the line A-B is pointing due north. Draw a straight line west from C and another NNE from point A. P is located at the intersection of these lines. And result - no circles.

melena

The answer for the first Q is :9O-4.5O=4.5O

melena

The answer for Q3 is:212112211

melena

The answer for Q8 :6
i will choose black, white,and red

melena

How i could contact with you ?
you should make a new glat

cymer

can i ask everybody about the kinds of "aptitude test"?please help me im a student..come from the phillippines..

Preetha

I recently attended google interviews.. it was like 3 screening interviews and 6 onsite interviews.. I believe that I did great job in all my interviews.. answered all their logical and analytical problems ... infact all interviewers appreciated me when they left.... I was confident that I will get selected... It took them atleast one month to give me the interview results.. I was not selected.. the reson I guess is, I am not from stanford or MIT or Carnegie Mellon University or IIT or BITS.. BUT MY QUESTION IS THIS .. IN THAT CASE, WHY DID THEY SELECT ME IN THE SCREENING INTERVIEWS ???... WHY DID THEY CALL ME FOR AN INTERVIEW ?? .. I wasted atleast one month refreshing all those stuffs I learnt in my undergrad and grad.. the whole process took me abt 2 months.. .. I believe its useless now.. atleast I know I must not apply for this company if I am not from the mentioned universities.

-Preetha

Ram

yes I agree with preetha... and also you must have atleast presented or published a research paper..

Aravind

A very amateurish program for solving Question 17 which takes 2.5 hours to arrive at the answer on my system :)

#include
int function(int n)
{
int i=0;
int j=0;
int k=0;
int m=0;
for(i=0;i<=n;++i)
{
m=i;
while(m)
{
k=m%10;
m=m/10;
if(k==1)
j++;
}
}
return j;
}
main()
{
int n=2;
int b;
while(n)
{
b=function(n);
if(b == n)
{
printf("\nYeah Baby the number: %d\n" , b );
exit(0);
}
n++ ;
}
}

Aravind

A much better program.. sack the old one :-)

#include
#include
int function(int n)
{
int a=0;
int b=0;
while(n)
{
a=n%10;
n=n/10;
if(a==1)
{
b++;
}
}
return b;
}
main()
{
static int k=1;
int i=2;
while(i)
{
k=k+function(i);
if(k==i)
{
printf("\nYeah Found:%d\n",k);
exit(0);
}
i++;
}
}

aditya sen singh

mail the GLAT questions

dating

That's so cool. I wish more teachers possessed that kind of enlightenment.

gbolcer

The correct answer for 9 is:



src="http://pagead2.googlesyndication.com/pagead/show_ads.js">

MMO

I dont think i could even answer one of those questions lol

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Music

Reading

  • John Battelle: The Search

    John Battelle: The Search
    My favorite book of 2005. Period.


    (*****)

  • Steven D. Levitt: Freakonomics : A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything

    Steven D. Levitt: Freakonomics : A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything
    "Just because two things are correlated does not mean that one causes the other. A correlation simply means that a relationship exists between two factors -- let's call them X and Y -- but it tells you nothing about the direction of that relationship. It's possible that X causes Y; it's also possible that Y causes X; and it may be that X and Y are both being caused by some other factor, Z.

    Economics is, at root, the study of incentives: how people get what they want, or need, especially when other people want or need the same thing.

    Incentives are the cornerstone of modern life. The conventional wisdom is often wrong. Dramatic effects often have distant, even subtle, causes. Experts use their informational advantage to serve their own agenda. Knowing what to measure and how to measure it makes a complicated world much less so." (*****)

  • Malcolm Gladwell: Blink

    Malcolm Gladwell: Blink
    A book of anecdotes about the power of thinking without thinking; this book is a more interesting read than Gladwell's previous, The Tipping Point.

    New York Times: "Gottman believes that each relationship has a DNA, or an essential nature. It's possible to take a very thin slice of that relationship, grasp its fundamental pattern and make a decent prediction of its destiny. Gladwell says we are thin-slicing all the time -- when we go on a date, meet a prospective employee, judge any situation. We take a small portion of a person or problem and extrapolate amazingly well about the whole."

    David Brooks, who wrote that review, adds: "Isn't it as possible that the backstage part of the brain might be more like a personality, some unique and nontechnological essence that cannot be adequately generalized about by scientists in white coats with clipboards?" (*****)

  • Paul Graham: Hackers and Painters

    Paul Graham: Hackers and Painters
    I don't agree with some parts of this book, but I truly loved reading it, and it really made me think. I referenced it in my weblications and superhacker and phoneboy posts. Favorite chapter is How to Make Wealth. (Thanks, Ev.) (*****)

  • Joel Spolsky: Joel on Software

    Joel Spolsky: Joel on Software
    Joel is really good at wielding "diverse and occasionally related matters of interest to software developers, designers, and managers, and those who, whether by good fotune or ill luck, work with them in some capacity."

    Joel on Software embodies the principle of "Welcome to management! Guess what? Managing software projects has nothing at all to do with programming." This book, a compendium of the website's wisdom, is useful for everyone from team leads estimating schedules to software CEOs developing competitive strategy. (*****)

  • Bruce Sterling: Tomorrow Now: Envisioning The Next Fifty Years

    Bruce Sterling: Tomorrow Now: Envisioning The Next Fifty Years
    Bruce wrote this book to come to terms with seven novel aspects of the twenty-first century, situations that are novel to that epoch and no other. It's about future possibilities.

    "This is the future as it is felt and understood: via human experience... The years to come are not merely imaginary. They are history that hasn't happened yet. People will be born into these coming years, grow to maturity in them, struggle with their issues, personify those years, and bear them in their flesh. The future will be lived." Here here, well-spoken, Bruce. (*****)

  • The World's 20 Greatest Unsolved Problems: John Vacca

    The World's 20 Greatest Unsolved Problems: John Vacca
    "Science has extended life, conquered disease, and offered new sexual and commercial freedoms through its rituals of discovery, but many unsolved problems remain...

    If support for science falters and if the American public loses interest in it, such apathy may foster an age in which scientific elites ignore the public will and global imperatives." (*****)

  • Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, L. Hunter Lovins : Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution

    Paul Hawken, Amory Lovins, L. Hunter Lovins : Natural Capitalism: Creating the Next Industrial Revolution
    I had the pleasure recently of meeting Amory Lovins and hearing him talk about Twenty Hydrogen Myths and the design of hypercar. (He also talked about Bonobos... wow.) I'm a convert to the way of thinking espoused in Natural Capitalism. I used to be cynical about the future, but Amory's work has made me a believer that many great things are about to come. The best way to predict the future is to invent it. (*****)

  • Merrill R. Chapman: In Search of Stupidity: Over 20 Years of High-Tech Marketing Disasters

    Merrill R. Chapman: In Search of Stupidity: Over 20 Years of High-Tech Marketing Disasters
    In hilarious prose, this book catalogs lots of stoopid high-tech marketing decisions. It offers clear, detailed analysis of many a marketing mishap, with what happened, why, and how to avoid such stupidity. Might just be the best. book. ever... (*****)

  • Paul Krugman: The Great Unraveling: Losing Our Way in the New Century

    Paul Krugman: The Great Unraveling: Losing Our Way in the New Century
    A book exposing the pitfalls of crony capitalism, from corrupt corporations straight up to the executive branch of our government. Krugman is nonpartisan -- what he exposes is foolish short-term thinking on the part of recent United States policies. The patriotic thing to do, he advises, is to fix these economic problems now before they become much harder to solve.

  • Henry Petroski: Small Things Considered: Why There Is No Perfect Design

    Henry Petroski: Small Things Considered: Why There Is No Perfect Design
    "Design can be easy and difficult at the same time, but in the end, it is mostly difficult." (*****)

  • Alexander Blakely: Siberia Bound

    Alexander Blakely: Siberia Bound
    One of my favorite books of the past few years. Xander is a master storyteller. (*****)

  • Susan Scott: Fierce Conversations

    Susan Scott: Fierce Conversations
    How to make every conversation count. One of my favorite books of the last decade. (*****)

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 08/2003